Sign up for the Slatest to get insightful analysis, criticism, and advice delivered daily to your inbox. In February 2017, the Washington Post adopted the slogan “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” marking a historic moment. The phrase, though criticized for being self-important, underscored the newspaper’s commitment to exposing unethical practices during the Trump administration. Under Marty Baron’s editorial leadership and Jeff Bezos’ financial backing, the Post excelled, attracting subscribers eager for accountability. From 2016 through 2021, the newspaper produced significant investigative journalism, including coverage of Trump’s alleged charitable giving and Russian election interference, arguably its best work since Watergate. This focus wasn’t merely “Trump derangement syndrome” but an editorial strategy driven by the historical moment. By January 2021, the Post had turned profitable, buoyed by subscriptions and advertising revenue. However, by 2025, with Trump back in office, Bezos has shifted the Post’s focus to avoid antagonizing the administration. This includes reshaping the opinion section to emphasize “personal liberty and free markets,” a move that aligns with Bezos’ broader business interests. Recent layoffs and leadership changes have affected the paper’s journalistic quality. In 2023, the Post faced a $77 million loss, leading to staff reductions. In 2024, Bezos appointed a new publisher whose strategies further strained operations. The Post’s decision not to endorse a presidential candidate in October led to subscription cancellations. Internally, the paper adopted a new motto, “Riveting Storytelling for All of America,” signaling a shift from its previous focus on accountability. Bezos’ changes seem aimed at mollifying Trump, ensuring favorable conditions for Amazon and Blue Origin amid federal cutbacks. Critics argue that Bezos could sustain the Post’s journalistic integrity given his wealth but is prioritizing other business interests. The Post’s altered editorial direction reflects Bezos’ transactional approach, potentially averting antitrust issues while positioning his enterprises to benefit from privatized government functions. — news from Slate
