The proposed $72 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Netflix has triggered widespread alarm across Hollywood, where industry professionals fear the consolidation could reduce competition, limit creative opportunities, and increase costs for viewers. While Netflix emerged victorious over Paramount and Comcast in a high-stakes bidding contest, the potential merger has raised red flags among unions, producers, and theater operators. n nThe Writers Guild of America warned that combining the world’s largest streaming platform with a major content producer contradicts antitrust principles, potentially leading to job losses, suppressed wages, and diminished content variety. Similarly, SAG-AFTRA, representing actors, voiced serious concerns about the implications for creative talent whose careers depend on a diverse and competitive entertainment landscape. n nCinema United, representing over 30,000 U.S. movie screens, described the deal as an “unprecedented threat” to theatrical exhibition. The group criticized Netflix’s historical preference for direct-to-consumer releases, arguing that its business model undermines traditional cinema. Michael O’Leary, the organization’s CEO, urged regulators to scrutinize the transaction for its potential harm to consumers and the broader industry. n nDespite these concerns, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos defended the company’s approach, noting that around 30 films were released in theaters this year. He emphasized that the company opposes lengthy exclusive theatrical windows, which he believes are not consumer-friendly. Sarandos assured that Warner Bros.’ planned theatrical releases would continue under Netflix’s ownership. n nThe acquisition would grant Netflix control over iconic franchises such as “Batman,” “Harry Potter,” “Friends,” and HBO’s acclaimed series including “Game of Thrones.” It would also eliminate HBO Max as a standalone competitor, consolidating immense content power under one platform. n nRoss Benes, a senior analyst at eMarketer, cautioned that reduced competition could lead to higher subscription fees, fewer original productions, and workforce reductions. He noted that while the deal is not yet finalized, its approval could reshape the entertainment ecosystem in ways that favor dominant players over creators and audiences. n nMeanwhile, Paramount has positioned itself as a theater-friendly alternative, securing commitments from top-tier talent like Tom Cruise and the Duffer Brothers through strategies emphasizing cinematic releases. This contrast highlights a growing divide between streaming-centric and theater-supportive models in an evolving media landscape. n
— News Original —nHollywood, already on shaky economic ground, shudders at the prospect of a mega-Netflixn nThe business of Hollywood was in trouble long before the earth-rattling news that Netflix had inked a $72 billion takeover of Warner Bros. And while the deal is widely seen as a coup by Netflix, once a scrappy startup that had to fight to be taken seriously, it also threatens to further shrink the industry and raise prices for consumers. n nProducers, actors, writers and theater owners are not thrilled about the prospect of a mega-Netflix dominating show business, with major unions and trade groups expressing deep concern about the potential impact on jobs and communities. n n“The world’s largest streaming company swallowing one of its biggest competitors is what antitrust laws were designed to prevent,” the Writers Guild of America, the union representing Hollywood writers, said Friday. “The outcome would eliminate jobs, push down wages, worsen conditions for all entertainment workers, raise prices for consumers, and reduce the volume and diversity of content for all viewers.” n nNetflix triumphed over Paramount and Comcast late Thursday in a bidding war for Warner Bros., surprising many in the industry who saw Paramount as a shoo-in. n n“Holy f—k. Netflix got WBD,” one Paramount staffer said in a text to CNN on Thursday night. n nDavid Zaslav, the CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, CNN’s parent company, attributed the decision to “the realities of an industry undergoing generational change.” n nThe entertainment industry has experienced a series of upheavals in recent years. Studio consolidation accelerated in the late 2010s, leading to fewer projects being greenlit for production. The Covid-19 pandemic halted production for months, pushing studios to delay or cancel projects, leaving thousands out of work. Movie theaters faced an existential crisis during lockdowns, and have yet to reach pre-Covid audience levels. At the same time, TV and film productions have been increasingly moved out of the United States entirely to take advantage of lower labor costs and tax incentives. n nAll of that has rapidly shrunk the entertainment economy. Now, many worry the proposed Netflix deal will further erode their job security. n n“Producers are rightfully concerned” about the potential deal, the Producers Guild of America said in a statement. “Our legacy studios are more than content libraries — within their vaults are the character and culture of our nation.” n nSAG-AFTRA, Hollywood’s biggest actors union, also expressed concern about the potential deal, saying it raises “many serious questions” about the future of the entertainment industry, “especially the human creative talent whose livelihoods and careers depend on it.” n nTheater owners, in particular, dread the idea of negotiating future film releases with the company that built its business partly on bypassing theaters to bring original content directly to viewers. The big screen would face “an unprecedented threat,” according to Cinema United, a trade association that represents more than 30,000 movie screens in the United States. n n“Netflix’s stated business model does not support theatrical exhibition,” Cinema United President and CEO Michael O’Leary said in a statement. “In fact, it is the opposite. Regulators must look closely at the specifics of this proposed transaction and understand the negative impact it will have on consumers, exhibition and the entertainment industry.” n nThe streaming Goliath n nNetflix has been pushing back on that argument. n n“We’ve released about 30 films into theaters this year, so it’s not like we have this opposition to movies in theaters,” Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said in a call with Wall Street analysts Friday. “My pushback has been mostly in the fact of the long, exclusive windows, which we don’t really think are that consumer-friendly.” n nHe added: “Right now, you should count on everything that is planned on going to the theater through Warner Bros. will continue to go to the theaters through Warner Bros.” n nNetflix only occasionally releases its films to theaters to meet the criteria for Oscar nominations. Its business model has always been based on maintaining a giant library of movies and TV shows that viewers can access anywhere, anytime. n nBy acquiring Warner Bros., Netflix would gain access to some of Hollywood’s most beloved and lucrative titles, including “Batman” and “Harry Potter,” as well as a deep, 100-year-old library of Hollywood classics like “Casablanca” and “The Wizard of Oz.” At the same time, it would control decades’ worth of network TV shows like “Friends” along with all of HBO’s prestige programming, such as “Game of Thrones.” n nOn top of all that, the deal would effectively allow Netflix, the streaming king, to wipe out its second-largest competitor after Disney: HBO Max. n n“This is not a win for consumers,” Ross Benes, a senior analyst at eMarketer, told CNN. “Netflix has already aggressively raised prices, increased ad load, and stopped people from sharing passwords. Absorbing a competitor with strong content will only lead to its service becoming more expensive and give consumers less choice.” n nIt could also be bad news for the tens of thousands of workers employed by the film and TV industry. Benes said the deal would likely lead to layoffs and reduce the number of companies willing to spend heavily on TV and movies. n n“This contracts the industry,” he said, while noting that the deal is far from done. n nOn Thursday, as news emerged that Netflix was the top bidder for Warner Bros., an anonymous group of “concerned feature film producers” sent an open letter to Congress, warning of a potential economic and institutional “meltdown in Hollywood” if Netflix were to succeed, according to Variety. n nThe filmmakers argued that Netflix would “effectively hold a noose around the theatrical marketplace.” n nParamount, on the other hand, took a different approach in its bid for Warner Bros., wooing talent with a theater-forward strategy. n nDespite changes in the entertainment landscape, creative talent both in front of and behind the camera are eager for audiences to experience their work in theaters — not from the couch. It’s one of the reasons why Netflix’s top creators, the Duffer Brothers — best known for writing and producing the series “Stranger Things” — are jumping ship from Netflix to Paramount. n nParamount has also inked deals with some of the biggest names in movies over the past few months, including Tom Cruise, Will Smith, “Wicked” director John M. Chu and director James Mangold.
