Latino Voters Prioritize Working-Class Economic Relief Over Tax Breaks for Wealthy

Amid ongoing inflation and economic uncertainty, many Latino households across the United States continue to face financial strain. A July 2025 survey conducted by Data for Progress in collaboration with Equis reveals that a significant portion of registered Latino voters believe the national economy is underperforming and that current policies are failing to address everyday challenges. The findings indicate a strong preference for legislative action focused on easing financial burdens for working- and middle-income families, including higher taxes on large corporations and the wealthiest individuals to fund such initiatives.

When evaluating the current state of the economy, 64% of surveyed Latino voters described it as either “somewhat” or “very” poor. While Republicans were more likely to express optimism, majorities of Democrats (79%) and Independents (69%) shared a negative assessment. This sentiment was consistent across gender lines and even among those who shifted support from Joe Biden to Donald Trump between 2020 and 2024, or chose not to vote in 2024—62% and 65% of whom, respectively, rated economic conditions poorly. These results suggest a widespread disconnect between official narratives about economic performance and the lived experiences of Latino communities.

Looking ahead, most Latino voters do not expect improvement in the coming year. Over half believe economic conditions will either “probably” or “definitely” worsen. This outlook is particularly pronounced among Democrats (75%), Independents (57%), and women (60%). In contrast, Republicans and male respondents showed more optimism or remained divided. This divergence underscores skepticism toward the current administration’s economic direction, especially among key demographic groups.

When ranking policy priorities, respondents placed the highest importance on issues directly affecting household budgets. Lowering grocery prices emerged as the top concern, followed by reducing taxes for working- and middle-class families, increasing wages and benefits, and improving access to affordable healthcare. Conversely, cutting taxes for large corporations and high-net-worth individuals was ranked as the least urgent objective, reinforcing a clear preference for policies that support economic equity rather than favoring affluent groups.

The survey, conducted from July 7 to 17, 2025, included 1,614 registered Latino voters nationwide via web panels, with oversampling in key states and congressional districts. It was administered in both English and Spanish and weighted to reflect demographic and voting patterns. The margin of error is ±2 percentage points, with larger variances for subgroups. Methodologically, the study used maximum difference scaling (MaxDiff) to assess the relative importance of 24 economic priorities by asking participants to repeatedly select the most and least critical items from randomized sets of four. The final rankings reflect net importance—the difference between the projected percentage viewing each item as most important versus least important.

— news from Data For Progress

— News Original —
Latino Voters Want Working Class Relief Prioritized in U.S. Economic Policy
Amid a chaotic tariff rollout and persistent inflation, voters across the country continue to experience the economic downturn and resulting financial hardships facing their households and communities. In line with this, a July 2025 survey of registered Latino voters in the U.S. performed by Data for Progress, in partnership with Equis, finds that these voters believe that the U.S. economy is not doing well and that our current policies are not driving it in the right direction. Instead, these voters want to see their lawmakers pass policies that will alleviate the everyday financial challenges facing working and middle class households and increase taxes on the ultra-wealthy and big corporations to fund such policies.

When asked to rate the state of the U.S. economy today, almost two-thirds of registered Latino voters (64%) say the economy is doing “somewhat” or “very” poorly. While Republicans were more likely to have a positive outlook on the economy, strong majorities of both Democrats (79%) and Independents (69%) rate the economy as poor. We also find that strong majorities of voters across gender share this pessimistic view of the economy. Finally, even voters who defected from Joe Biden to Donald Trump between 2020 and 2024 or chose to abstain entirely from voting in the 2024 election are more likely to rate the economy as doing poorly today (62% and 65%, respectively). Together this shows that, regardless of how positively the current administration tries to pitch the current state of the U.S. economy, registered Latino voters are not seeing any such positive outcomes in their daily lives. With a parallel poll of non-Latino respondents similarly showing majorities of respondents rating the U.S. economy as “poor,” it is clear that this negative economic outlook is a widely held perception across the U.S. electorate.

Furthermore, these same voters do not anticipate that economic conditions will improve in the next year. In fact, a majority of registered Latino voters believe that the economy will either “probably” or “definitely” get worse over the course of the next year. Once again, we find that much of this result is driven by partisan attachments, with this sentiment being most strongly held by Democrats (75%), Independents (57%) and women (60%), while Republicans and Biden 2020 defectors remain hopeful about the economy’s future outlook and men are largely split. Together, this suggests that registered Latino voters are, on balance, not convinced that the president and the administration overall is currently on the right track in regards to their economic policies.

When asked to rank a wide variety of economic priorities from most to least important for lawmakers to address, registered Latino voters rank kitchen table issues and other challenges facing working and middle class families as most important. Specifically, these voters rank lowering grocery costs as their most important priority, followed by lowering taxes for the working and middle class, increasing worker pay and benefits, and making health care more affordable and accessible. In contrast, these voters are most likely to rank lowering taxes for big corporations and the wealthy as their lowest priority for lawmakers to address, underlining their preference for providing economic relief to working class households over tax breaks for the wealthy. With non-Latino voters also ranking lowering grocery costs and taxes for working and middle class households as their top two priorities, lawmakers emphasizing how they are addressing these everyday concerns could have broad appeal with U.S. voters.

Survey Methodology

From July 7 to 17, 2025, Data for Progress, in partnership with Equis, conducted a survey of 1,614 U.S. registered Latino voters nationally using web panel respondents. The sample was weighted to be representative of Latino registered voters by age, gender, education, race, geography, and recalled presidential vote. The survey included oversamples of a pooled set of AZ, NM, and NV. It also included oversamples of the following pooled congressional districts: CA-03, CA-09, CA-13, CA-22, CA-27, CA-40, CA-41, CA-45, CA-47, AZ-01, AZ-06, NV-03, NM-02, CO-08, TX-28, TX-34, TX-15, NJ-07, NJ-09, NY-03, NY-04, NY-17, PA-07, PA-08. The oversamples were weighted to ensure proportional representation of registered voters. The survey was conducted in English and Spanish. The margin of error associated with the sample size is ±2 percentage points. Results for subgroups of the sample are subject to increased margins of error. For more information please visit https://dataforprogress.org/our-methodology.

Data for Progress conducted message testing through maximum difference scaling (MaxDiff) to determine the ordinal ranking of 24 priorities. Respondents were shown a randomized subset of 4 of the priorities, and asked to pick the most and least important priority from those options. They were then asked to do the same across multiple rounds, each time with a new set of 4 randomized priorities.

Using these responses, we project what percentage of registered voters would select each priority as the most important and what percentage of registered voters would select each priority as the least important from the full set of priorities. The scores below represent net importance of each priority — meaning, the projected percentage of registered voters viewing a certain priority as the most important, minus the projected percentage viewing it as the least important.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *