The Saarland Transformation Fund, established with €2.9 billion in funding, represents one of the most ambitious regional economic initiatives in postwar Germany. Designed to drive structural change in a historically industrial region, the fund targets three core areas: industrial modernization, infrastructure development, and innovation commercialization. Approximately €850 million is allocated to upgrading legacy sectors such as steel and automotive manufacturing, while €1.1 billion supports large-scale energy infrastructure, including hydrogen production facilities and retrofitted public buildings. Another €750 million is dedicated to advancing applied research in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and quantum technologies, with the aim of fostering high-tech startups and strengthening regional innovation networks.
Rather than functioning as a passive subsidy mechanism, the fund operates as a strategic investment vehicle designed to attract private capital. It follows a leverage model where public funding is expected to mobilize at least an equivalent amount from private or federal sources. In major projects like Power4Steel—a green steel initiative by Stahl-Holding-Saar—public financing accounts for 60% of total investment, with the Saarland fund contributing 30% and the federal government 70% of that share. This co-financing structure ensures shared risk and enhances fiscal efficiency. Financial instruments vary by project, including direct grants, equity stakes, and convertible loans, particularly for early-stage ventures.
Governance is centralized under a steering committee led by the Ministry of Finance, with input from economists and local experts. Proposals undergo rigorous evaluation based on feasibility, job creation potential, emissions reduction, and alignment with long-term transformation goals. Disbursements occur incrementally, tied to project milestones, minimizing financial risk and preventing premature expenditure. As of mid-2025, about €1.9 billion had been committed across more than 30 approved initiatives, though only around €450 million had been disbursed, reflecting the long timelines typical of industrial and infrastructure development.
One notable setback involved the suspension of Wolfspeed’s planned semiconductor plant, which would have received €500 million in combined federal and state support. However, due to the fund’s phased funding model, no irreversible costs were incurred, and the site remains available for future investment. Officials emphasize that the fund is managed as a portfolio, acknowledging that some projects may fail while overall returns must justify borrowing costs.
Key initiatives include the redevelopment of former industrial sites such as the old Ford factory, enabling rapid deployment of new enterprises, and the expansion of CISPA, the Helmholtz Center for Information Security, which aims to position Saarland as a hub for digital innovation. These efforts are expected to generate high-skilled employment, attract research funding, and stimulate spin-offs in emerging tech fields.
Monitoring systems are now in place to track outcomes such as jobs secured, CO₂ reductions, and private capital mobilized. Starting in 2026, annual progress reports will provide transparent assessments of performance. While full results are still pending, the fund has already influenced national discussions on public investment frameworks and fiscal rule flexibility. Its success lies not only in funding projects but in creating an institutional model for managing economic transformation under tight budgetary constraints.
— news from Harvard Kennedy School
— News Original —
Regional Economic Transformation in Germany: The Origins and Evolution of the Saarland Transformation Fund
Its design is not that of a passive subsidy vehicle. The fund seeks to attract additional capital from corporate co-investors, as well as from federal and EU initiatives, especially for capital-intensive projects such as hydrogen infrastructure, green steel, and university-led research. For example, the new Center for Quantum Technologies at Saarland University, financed by the fund, aims to enhance the state’s chances of securing national and EU support.[3] As such, the fund supports projects in three areas: industrial decarbonization and modernization, infrastructure and energy upgrades, and the commercialization of innovation and research.[4] n nThere was an active debate over how wide the fund’s scope should be. Some favored a narrow focus on major industrial projects like green steel or semiconductors. Others emphasized the need to support startups and innovation ecosystems. Minister von Weizsäcker stated, “The final design reflects an intentional choice to avoid setting legacy sectors and new industries against one another. Instead of choosing between startup founders and steelworkers, the fund aims to support both by combining short-term stabilization with long-term diversification.” n nSeveral of the fund’s design features reflect trade-offs made in real time, under pressure, and without a national template to follow. Jakob von Weizsäcker notes in retrospect that Saarland’s leadership had to build a legally sound and politically viable instrument while navigating unchartered terrain. The result was not just a crisis response, but an institutional innovation – one that is now shaping national discussions about how public investment can be structured in a fiscally constrained environment. n nStrategic Focus and Investment Structure n nThe Saarland Transformation Fund is the most comprehensive economic policy instrument in the state’s postwar history, with €2.9 billion earmarked to accelerate the shift toward a competitive, low-emission economy. The fund channels resources into three interconnected investment pillars. n nIndustrial Transformation – circa €0.85 billion n nSupports the modernization of Saarland’s legacy industries, especially steel, automotive, and mechanical engineering, while also promoting new industrial uses for brownfield sites. A special focus is also placed on enabling SMEs to participate in future-oriented supply chains.[5] n nInfrastructure Development – circa €1.1 billion n nFinances large scale infrastructure for the production and transportation of energy, including hydrogen production and pipeline networks, natural gas grid upgrades, and the deep retrofitting of public buildings.[5] n nInnovation and Research Commercialization – circa €0.75 billion n nFunds for applied R&D projects, spin-off incubation, and startup investment in fields such as AI, cybersecurity, quantum research and the circular economy, with the goal of strengthening Saarland’s innovation ecosystem and enabling digital and green transformation across sectors.[5] n nAmong other factors, the Finance Minister notes the importance of establishing clear priorities at the outset. Industrial policy typically involves a lot of discretion. In light of that, “these distinct areas help ministries focus and make it easier to reject proposals that do not align with transformation goals.” n nFunding proposals are submitted by sectoral ministries and reviewed by a central steering committee, led by the Ministry of Finance and advised by a council of economists and local experts. Projects are assessed based on feasibility, co-financing potential, and contributions to job creation, emissions reduction, and resilience.[6] But the process is more iterative than a one-time review: typically, new project ideas are first presented to the fund’s administrative unit at the Ministry of Finance, which provides initial feedback and helps shape the final proposal. Once the steering committee, composed of the State Secretary to the Prime Minister, the Minister of Finance and Science, and the Minister of Economic Affairs, approves funding, disbursements are made to the lead ministry according to the annual schedule. That ministry is then responsible for allocating funds to third-party recipients, overseeing implementation, and reporting back to the fund’s administrative unit. n nThe fund operates as a rolling portfolio, allowing for flexible allocation as projects mature. All funded projects must define measurable outcomes, such as private capital mobilized or CO₂ savings, and submit regular progress reports. These reports feed into a monitoring system developed by the Ministry of Finance and Science.[6] n nFinancing Approach n nThe Saarland Transformation Fund was designed as a strategic investment instrument, not a traditional subsidy program. Its goal is to catalyze structural transformation by de-risking private-sector investment and aligning public funds with long-term industrial and climate objectives. n n1. Instruments: Subsidies, Loans, and Equity n nThe fund uses a mix of financial tools selected based on the specific characteristics and implementation requirements of individual projects, rather than general risk profiles or investment readiness. For example, the startup fund is structured as an equity-based instrument and implemented through the Saarland Investment and Credit Bank (SIKB), while the acquisition of the former Ford plant site was executed via an equity increase for the state. Most other projects are financed through traditional direct subsidies.[7] n nDirect subsidies are the most common instrument and are applied to high-priority transformation projects, especially in green steel, hydrogen infrastructure, public building retrofits, and innovation or research commercialization. These are typically structured in line with EU state aid rules and often combined with federal and EU funds.[7] n nEquity-based instruments are used in selected cases to support innovation ecosystems. These may include public equity stakes or convertible loans to startups, aimed at crowding in private venture capital by lowering early-stage risk. n nAll instruments are tied to clear performance indicators, such as job creation, private capital mobilization, and climate impact, and are assessed for alignment with Saarland’s transformation goals. n n2. Co-Financing and Leverage Targets n nA central design feature of the fund is catalytic leverage: public investment should attract at least an equal amount of private or third-party capital. n nIn IPCEI projects (e.g. green hydrogen, Power4Steel), funding typically follows a 40/60 model: n n40% private financing n n60% public support, of which: n n70% comes from the federal government n n30% comes from the Saarland Transformation Fund n nOutside the IPCEI framework, matching strategies vary: n nStartups may receive public equity or grants, typically via SIKB, under pari passu terms with at least 50% private co-financing n nSMEs may qualify for more flexible co-financing thresholds, depending on their financial capacity n nAll project proposals must include detailed financing plans that specify: n nSources of funding n nDisbursement schedules n nAccountability mechanisms n nThis leverage model serves both fiscal and strategic purposes: it maximizes the use of public resources and ensures that public and private actors share risk in the transformation process. “It’s about using every public euro to shift the bigger system,” said Johannes Bersch. “If we don’t crowd in private investment, we’ll never get the scale or speed this transformation asks for.” n nLooking ahead, the fund is beginning to make use of so-called financial transactions—asset-based financing instruments that allow borrowing without relying on the emergency exemption under the debt brake. These mechanisms broaden the legal options available to the state and offer additional flexibility for long-term capital investments. According to von Weizsäcker, this hybrid approach is not only fiscally prudent but also helps align Saarland’s strategy with emerging national discussions about modernizing public investment frameworks in Germany. n nCase Studies n nThe Fund has supported a variety of projects, ranging from early-stage startups to large industrial employers, from university research projects to SME investments – illustrating its role in both stabilizing existing industries and enabling long-term transformation. The following three cases were selected to showcase the fund’s breadth across infrastructure, industrial decarbonization, and research commercialization. In addition to these examples, the fund also supports innovation-driven initiatives such as the Startup Fund, the Center for Quantum Technologies, and numerous smaller-scale projects across sectors. More than 30 projects have been approved to date. n nIndustrial and Commercial Site Preparation (Enabling Infrastructure – Greenfield and Brownfield Development) n nIn response to the need for a more rapid and more expensive industrial change, the government of Saarland has embarked on a strategic program to enhance the supply of competitive industrial and commercial land. The program “Vorbereitende Maßnahmen für Industrie- und Gewerbeansiedlungen” assists in the purchase, development, and servicing of important sites throughout the state, offering the physical foundation for new company establishments and expansions. n nThe initiative addresses both greenfield and brownfield development. Strategic greenfield locations are being prepared for near-term industrial use. At the same time, brownfield reactivations – particularly the former Ford plant and the former Ensdorf power plant – allow for quicker project approvals by leveraging existing infrastructure and shortened permitting timelines. A supplementary brownfield registry (Kataster) improves planning transparency and helps accelerate investment decisions. n nThis project is crucial for securing anchor investments in transformation-oriented industries. It also serves as a buffer against job losses in traditional sectors by creating new, future-oriented employment opportunities in climate-neutral industries. By increasing site readiness and leveraging federal and EU funding, the Saarland government aims to improve economic resilience and avoid a cycle of job losses, deindustrialization, and fiscal constraint.[8] n nPower4Steel (SHS – Green Steel Transition) n nPower4Steel is SHS’s (Stahl-Holding-Saar) flagship decarbonization initiative, co-financed with €2.6 billion in public funds (€1.82 billion federal, €780 million from the Saarland Transformation Fund). It includes two electric arc furnaces and a direct reduction plant in Dillingen, initially powered by gas and later by hydrogen. n nThe project anchors Saarland’s industrial transition, supporting up to 20,000 direct and indirect jobs in the steel cluster. It also plays a strategic role in anchoring regional hydrogen infrastructure, providing long-term demand that supports projects like the mosaHYc pipeline and positioning Saarland for future integration into the German and European hydrogen backbone. SHS remains privately owned, with governance tied to funding conditions rather than equity. Without public intervention, cost impacts from the Ukraine war could have triggered deindustrialization. Power4Steel helps preserve critical industries, reduce emissions, and establish Saarland as a hub for green steel. n nCISPA (Research and Innovation – Cybersecurity & AI) n nCISPA, the Helmholtz Center for Information Security based in Saarland, plays a central role in strengthening the state’s innovation ecosystem. During the economic disruptions following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which led to reduced liquidity and a drop in corporate R&D activity, CISPA’s growth countered the downturn and drove technology and knowledge transfer. n nThe CISPA project is funded by the Saarland Transformation Fund as a strategic response to the economic emergency. It finances the initial development of a major expansion (as well as the expansion itself at a later point) to build a regional innovation cluster in AI and cybersecurity, involving CISPA, the CISPA Innovation Campus, and nearby universities and research institutions.[9] n nBy adding research staff and infrastructure, the project aims to: n nDeepen collaboration with local SMEs and industrial firms n nBoost Saarland’s participation in federal and EU research programs n nAttract national and international talent to the region n nLay the foundation for spinoffs and high-tech startups in ICT, cybersecurity, and AI sectors n nThe expansion is expected to generate high-skilled employment, enhance Saarland’s reputation as an innovation hub, and help compensate for industrial value chains in decline. According to the Chamber of Industry and Commerce, public investment in CISPA unlocks significant co-financing from federal sources and third-party research grants, multiplying the economic impact of state funds.[9] n nAssessing impact n nAs of the latest reporting in early 2025, some €1.9 billion of the Saarland Transformation Fund’s total volume of €2.9 billion has been committed for use. Both committed funds and funds that have been distributed are included from the fund’s three pillars. But a large portion of these funds have not yet been transferred in full to project implementers. As of July 2025, only around €450 million of the €1.9 billion committed have actually been disbursed. n nOn the one hand, this gap between commitment and disbursement is a reflection of the fund’s intentional financial design. Committed funds typically cover the full multi-year duration of a project, with disbursements planned incrementally over time. Some projects extend to 2032, and payments are scheduled annually according to each project’s implementation timeline. This staggered disbursement approach ensures that public funds are only drawn when actually needed, avoiding unnecessary interest costs and improving fiscal efficiency. Overall, the disbursement timeline aligns with the fund’s long-term strategy. Most spending is expected to occur over a five- to eight-year horizon as approved projects move from planning into implementation. n nBut this gap between commitments and disbursements also points to the implementation challenges associated with large-scale transformation projects, particularly when a range of ministries and levels of government are involved. A report in the Saarländischer Rundfunk attributes these delays to complex federal approval processes, site-specific permitting hurdles, and coordination bottlenecks. The slowdown reflects the technical and procedural complexity of large industrial and infrastructure projects. These efforts are often slowed by multi-level planning, interministerial coordination, and environmental permitting. Projects in hydrogen infrastructure, green steel, and research finance face especially long time lags between approval and execution. n nJob Creation and Retention n nIn terms of its broader economic impacts, the Saarland Transformation Fund aims to support both labor market stability and climate goals. As such, it funds projects that create or secure jobs, reduce dependencies from fossil energy sources and thereby also emissions, and build long-term economic resilience. Several large projects are now in planning or early construction phases, so data on outcomes and impact remains limited. n nThe fund helps protect jobs in core sectors like steel and automotive, while supporting growth in hydrogen, digital tech, and sustainable manufacturing. Job impacts are expected from: n nRetrofitting factories n nBuilding infrastructure (e.g. hydrogen pipelines, public building upgrades) n nScaling startups and SMEs through innovation funding n nEach project must report job metrics, tracked by the Ministry of Finance through a monitoring system.[10] Aggregate numbers are not yet available, but the system is designed to flag early issues and show progress. n nCO2 Reduction n nThe fund supports emissions cuts by: n nBacking hydrogen-based steel production n nBuilding green hydrogen infrastructure n nRetrofitting public and industrial buildings[11] n nSHS projects, for example, aim to cut company emissions by up to 55 percent by 2030.[12] Projects must report emissions metrics where relevant. These will be reviewed as implementation progresses. n nDealing with failed investments n nOnly one large project has failed so far – Wolfspeed Inc.’s Saarland Chip plant, which paused its $3 billion investment for a semiconductor factory in Saarland. Per reports, the 500 million euros in federal and state subsidies were earmarked for this project. While this was a significant setback, von Weizsäcker emphasizes that the state avoided overcommitting, even though it had prepared the site. “When the project fell through, there were no sunk costs, and the site remains available for future investment.” n nThe fund’s structure has imposed guardrails that mitigate the fallouts. In such cases, unused funds are returned to the Transformation Fund’s budget, used to repay part of the fund’s debt, or reallocated to other stronger initiatives. Some proposals were delayed or withdrawn before approval, avoiding sunk costs.[12] The core design elements of staggered funding and conditional approvals have been effective in managing risk. n nWhile industrial policies often run the risk of being defined by failed investments, the Finance Minister and the team running the fund noted from the outset the need to assess the fund’s performance as a portfolio and not in terms of individual deals: “The fund is structured with a portfolio logic. Some projects are expected to fail, but the overall return across the portfolio is what matters.” He adds, “The claim of a courageous, good industrial policy can never be a 100% success rate… You have to be aware that not every single project will be a complete success, that innovations can and will fail, and that criticism is inevitable for each individual project.” The return on investment must exceed the cost of borrowing – justifying a strategy that allows for calculated risks in the interest of long-term transformation. This thinking has translated into public communication and narrative management too. So far, this framing has held up because there have not been any major financial losses. n nLarge projects, such as hydrogen investments across the SaarLorLux region, are underway.[13] They involve multi-year coordination, and full results on jobs, emissions, or capital mobilized are not yet available. n nThe Ministry of Finance and Science runs annual progress reports (Fortschrittsberichte) based on spending and implementation milestones. A central database is being built to track outputs like financial performance, CO₂ impact, and job numbers.[14] While the system was only fully established recently, it will now enable systematic data collection. Johannes Bersch notes, “We are still in the early stages of most projects, but from now on we will systematically prepare data from the monitoring system, and starting in 2026, it will feed directly into the annual progress reports—tracking metrics like jobs created or secured, CO₂ reductions, startups, patents, and industry collaborations, depending on the project.” n nThe database is not yet public, but it will support real-time oversight as the fund expands. n nConclusion n nThe Saarland Transformation Fund has not only shaped the state’s approach to industrial renewal, but it has also helped pave the way for broader reforms, including the use of special funds and the evolution of Germany’s debt brake. As other regions face similar structural pressures, Saarland offers a concrete example of how to respond with coordinated public investment, political alignment, and a willingness to take risks. n nThe fund is unique in the German context, as a region-level initiative taking bold action with borrowed funds and doing so under a complex legal and political framework. Saarland’s case stands out because it was launched under pressure, with limited fiscal space, but a high degree of coordination and institutional innovation. The fund came about as a response to the transformative challenges of the state’s energy-intensive and sectorally-concentrated economy, made more urgent by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. But the team running the fund used this moment of multiple crises to create a bold vision for economic transformation. n nA key lesson from the fund’s experience is that economic transformation requires more than capital. It demands broad consensus, clear strategic boundaries, active oversight, and the courage to invest in uncertain outcomes. As von Weizsäcker notes, “The goal is not to protect every single job, but to build a better, different future. That requires taking risks. The return on investment must exceed the cost of borrowing. If we want real transformation, we have to accept that not everything will succeed.” n nSaarland’s approach does not offer a one-size-fits-all model. But it shows how even a small state can pioneer tools and principles that inform national debates. The coming years will determine whether the fund delivers on its full promise.